Discovered by Terry Lovejoy on 17 August 2014, comet C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) put on quite some show this spring. I had the opportunity to observe it on several occasions, using my 7×50 binos for the reports to COBS, and my scopes for the sketches.
The first sketch was made on 11 January. At the time the comet was just about visible naked eye and with the binos I estimated the magnitude to 4.5. There was no sign of the tail in the binos, but with the 16″ I saw hints of it. The tail was to elusive to put down in the sketch, so I just indicated my impressions with some dashes. When I later checked the observation at the laptop, it turned out that I had been spot on.
The second sketch was made two days later on 13 January. The comet now seemed considerably brighter, and with the binos I estimated the magnitude to 3.8. The tail was a difficult catch with the binos (at ZLM 5.5), but I eventually put it down as 1°. Due to it’s position in the local sky, I had to use the more portable 10″ for the sketch. In the eyepiece the coma was bright and very pronounced. Even the tail popped out nicely from the background. I also suspected two secondary streams of the tail, marked by the dashes to the left, but I am not sure that they were genuine. As it turned out this became my best view of the comet.
During the second half of January I made a couple of observations with the binos, but I didn’t sketch it again until 9 February. Even if the comet now had dimmed considerably (4.8) it still stood out quite well. At the time the tail didn’t show in the binos, but was not to difficult to catch in the big scope.
The last sketch was made under substandard skies on 14 February. Now the comet had faded to magnitude 5.5. Due to some haze the tail was very difficult to observe. It seemed to have a more fan-like shape than during previous observations, but that might have been the effect of the poor sky quality (or faint field stars playing a trick on me).
All in all I found C/2014 Q2 an entertaining companion during the few months I observed it. Not as forgiving as for example comet C/2011 L4 (PanSTARRS) of 2012, but still well worth the effort.